Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:25:43 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, Joshua Franklin Subject: Re: cygwin-apps Digest 15 Jan 2002 17:47:13 -0000 Issue 300 Message-ID: <20020115192543.O2015@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, Joshua Franklin References: <1011116833 DOT 22388 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <20020115181825 DOT 43689 DOT qmail AT web20002 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020115181825.43689.qmail@web20002.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:18:25AM -0800, Joshua Franklin wrote: > > Thanks for the patch. I applied it to my local > > sandbox but I > > was somewhat surprised about the behaviour since > > > > cygpath -D -A > > > > has another result as > > > > cygpath -A -D > > > > which is not what a user expects. The options > > should be scanned > > and after the scanning they should be evaluated > > (right after the > > switch statement). Would you mind to change your > > patch accordingly? > > > > Corinna > > > Yeah, I figured that since the (unpatched) cygpath's > current behaviour requires switches to precede other > options that this was expected: > > $ cygpath -Ww > /c/WINNT > > $ cygpath -wW > C:\WINNT > > Should I try and change that, too? That would be very nice! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.