Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <0ff001c19dcf$89028780$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Earnie Boyd" <Cygwin-Apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: "Mark Bradshaw" <bradshaw AT staff DOT crosswalk DOT com>, <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D2A12 AT cnmail> <0fce01c19dce$28cfb7d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C4438E8 DOT F9CECF96 AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: last package
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 01:18:41 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2002 14:18:32.0249 (UTC) FILETIME=[82DE6A90:01C19DCF]


===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: "Mark Bradshaw" <bradshaw AT staff DOT crosswalk DOT com>;
<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: last package


> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <bradshaw AT staff DOT crosswalk DOT com>
> > To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> > Subject: RE: last package
> >
> > > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> > package.
> > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
> > else's
> > > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> >
> > Yep, no problem.
> >
>
> In other words, you're setting precedent and creating policy.

I guess so. Policy that is (Although it's not my domain), as for
precedent - that already exists.

Rob