Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:22:54 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers) Message-ID: <20020113212254.GA23817@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020109183309 DOT GB6261 AT redhat DOT com> <024601c1995d$304b3d10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41314E DOT 50406 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <05ec01c19c02$d05b0c20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C4137B5 DOT 2000807 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <060001c19c06$097f5080$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41AEED DOT 2070904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <08a801c19c6f$b5539060$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41F902 DOT 5040608 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C41F902.5040608@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:15:46PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Robert Collins wrote: >>AH yes - thus showcasing the point at hand: >>"tetex" - "beta-20001218" - "cygver" is parsed as >>"tetex-beta" - "20001218" - "cygver"! > > >Hmmm...I must spend too much time with computers. My human brain parsed >tetex-beta-20001218-2 as "tetex-beta" "20001218" "2". > >You have been using tetex as an example of how setup/upset *misparses* a >string, while I thought it was a perfect example of good parsing. :-) Me too. It's the "tetex-beta" package. I shudder at the thought of trying to sort versions if beta is part of the version number. cgf