Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C41314E.50406@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 02:03:42 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers) References: <3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020109183309 DOT GB6261 AT redhat DOT com> <024601c1995d$304b3d10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Faylor" > > >>On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:21:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >>>Preliminary versions are here: >>>2) is "rc6" okay for a ${REL} number, or should it be a pure number? >>>(p.s. 'rc' means "robert collins hack" not "release candidate") >>> >>upset will do the right thing with it. I just checked. It even seems >> > to > >>properly support rc6 vs. rc7. >> >>I don't have any problems with it but it *is* a departure from the >>guidelines in http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I believe. >> >>I'll let Robert make the executive decision on this one, I think. >> > > I'd prefer a pure number, but if you think folk will get seriously > confused, then I guess rcx is ok. > > In general, I'd prefer that 'flavours' get indicated in the package name > (libtool_devel_rc-xxx-x-src.tar.bz2) Okay, I've renamed the devel package: libtool-devel-20010531-6 Again, it (and the others) are available at http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/libtool/ The setup.hint files are appended below. I still need some positive votes on this one.... --Chuck libtool (wrappers): ================================ sdesc: "wrapper scripts for libtool-devel and libtool-stable" ldesc: "GNU libtool is a generic library support script. Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. libtool contains libtool-scripts-20010531, and is meant to be installed alongside libtool-stable (which contains libtool-1.4.2) and alongside libtool-devel (which contains a hacked libtool-20010531). It exec's the appropriate version based on target package heuristics." category: Devel requires: ash libtool-devel libtool-stable libtool-devel ================================ sdesc: "A shared library generation tool" ldesc: "GNU libtool is a generic library support script. Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. libtool-devel contains a modified version of libtool from cvs (20010531) and supports `transparent' dll-building using the new auto-import functionality of binutils. libtool-devel is meant to be installed alongside libtool-stable (which contains libtool-1.4.2), and alongside the `libtool' package, which contains wrapper scripts which call the appropriate `real' libtool, stable or devel, based on target package heuristics." category: Devel requires: cygwin ash automake autoconf libtool libtool-stable ================================ sdesc: "A shared library generation tool" ldesc: "GNU libtool is a generic library support script. Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. libtool-stable contains libtool-1.4.2, and is meant to be installed alongside libtool-devel (which contains Robert Collin's hacked-up version of libtool-1.4, and supports `transparent' dll-building using the new auto-import functionality of binutils), and alongside the `libtool' package, which contains wrapper scripts which call the appropriate `real' libtool, stable or devel, based on target package heuristics." category: Devel requires: cygwin automake autoconf libtool ash