Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:26:44 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing
Message-ID: <20020110182644.GC26493@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3c3d6e873c4d5123 AT mel-rta10 DOT wanadoo DOT fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3c3d6e873c4d5123@mel-rta10.wanadoo.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:35:51AM +0200, J=?iso-8859-1?Q?=E9r=F4me-Georges-Michel BENOIT?= wrote:
>> Last night, I've rebuild the texmf packages, but I found that you
>> removed some texmf files, fontname and web2c
>>directories from tetex-bin/beta.
>
>This a big bug: I have to fix it:
>I have to reinclude them in the next rebuilt
>because the web2c directory contains
>binaries stuff (as the POOL file):
>DO NOT include them in texmf-*.
>
>I will fix it soon,
>thanks,
>Jerome

It doesn't seem like this package should be named tetex-beta-20001218.
Unless it is a modification of the sources from more than a year
ago, it should be renamed to a more recent date.

cgf