Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <096601c19aa8$bc6c1e30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Cc: "cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3C3EE6D5 DOT 8916443E AT wapme-systems DOT de> <72101602526 DOT 20020111144934 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C3EF0C4 DOT 8E174E43 AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:03:23 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2002 14:03:21.0872 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA96E900:01C19AA8]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>
> > Since `httpd' is more general I would prefer `apache'
> > from these two layouts.
>
> I disagree here! It's common style to have the protocoll name for /etc
> and /var sub-directories.

httpd is not the protocol name. It's a hangover from the CERN httpd that
started it all.

> BTW, RedHat and SuSE layout look pretty similar.
>
> Any other opinions from the list?

yes, /etc/apache please. Otherwise tinyhttpd or other www servers will
conflict with apache.

Rob