Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:30:16 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53t) Business Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: convey Information Systems GmbH X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <3993244037.20020111123016@familiehaase.de> To: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: new policy for packages In-Reply-To: <079301c19a87$404969a0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> References: <079301c19a87$404969a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert, 2002-01-11 11:35:51, du schriebst: > I want to suggest that the following become policy: > No new packages are accepted that require non-packaged prerequisites. [...] > Thoughts? Runtime only prerequisites? e.g. in rpm-4 there are db sources included in the source package which are statically linked in. I think this is really obvious. If I want to include a package which needs a dynamic version of db and the people are not able to fetch an official port then I will go on and build this needed db too. But to avoid discussions it should be mentioned at the guidelines. Gerrit -- =^..^=