Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:53:16 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: new policy for packages
Message-ID: <20020111115316.Y12057@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>,
	cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <079301c19a87$404969a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKCEMICIAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKCEMICIAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:43:28AM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
> > [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
> > 
> > I want to suggest that the following become policy:
> > 
> > No new packages are accepted that require non-packaged prerequisites.
> > 
> > i.e. using rpm which was raised on cygwin@ recently,
> > until db 3.2 is packaged and maintained by 'someone', rpm is not
> > acceptable as a package.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> I don't know how things could work any other way, in cases such as this anyway.

postgreSQL needs cygipc.

Luckily it's not a *new* packahge :)

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.