Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D29AE@cnmail> From: Mark Bradshaw To: CA List Subject: FW: whois package Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:51:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain It built OOTB. I remove some source for an alternate mkpasswd app the author had included. It wasn't needed for whois functionality. I didn't really consider that patching the app. Other than that, the only modifications that I made were to the Makefile to get things pointing in the right direction. I know the readme isn't that informative, but there just wasn't that much to tell. The author gave no instructions on the usage for whois, so I didn't bother either. The revert patch puts things back together, including the mkpasswd source. It didn't seem like it really applied to whois though, so I didn't mention it in the readme. If that bugs you I'll change it. Again, I didn't change ANY whois source. Oh, now that I think about it I did make one small change to some ancillary perl apps that help during the build process. It was a one-liner that is so trivial I doubt anyone'd care, but kept them from causing problems under some conditions. In any case, they're in the revert patch. Considering the small changes I made, I don't think it'd be necessary to split out another directory for cygwin patches. But, you're the pro. If you still think I should make the changes let me know. Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:gp AT familiehaase DOT de] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:42 AM > To: Mark Bradshaw > Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: whois package > > > Hallo Mark, > > Am 2002-01-09 um 05:24 schriebst du: > > > Just wanted to drop in a reminder about the whois package. Could I > > get an official/unofficial nanny to check it over, or at > least a note > > telling me to shut up til people have more time? > > > http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois > > I tried the executable, it seems to work well. > It is stripped now;) > > The Cygwin specific README is in the source package. > > Though, I prefer some more specific infos in the README, > so it isn't absolutely correct as you stated in the Cygwin > README, that you changed nothing than the prefix in the > makefile, there is this patch which, applied would put the > sources back to their original form. > > Or isn't the patch part of your port to Cygwin? > > Usual, or what is used often, is a seperate directory for > platform specific files like there is this debian directory, > on Cygwin there is often used a seperate directory too, named > `CYGWIN-PATCHES'. > > > Gerrit > -- > =^..^= > mailto:gp AT familiehaase DOT de >