Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C3C5A24.23D6C6E1@wapme-systems.de> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:56:36 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj Organization: Wapme Systems AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de]C-CCK-MCD QXW0322b (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22 package available for setup inclusion References: <3C3BFC4C DOT 15C3C81A AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20020109124852 DOT C1242 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <816103055 DOT 20020109125245 AT familiehaase DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > Corinna, > > 2002-01-09 12:50:02, du schriebst: > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: > >> Users may have to include /usr/libexec to their PATH, due to the fact > >> that libhttpd.dll resides there. Should we move at least that core > >> library to /usr/bin to have it in PATH like the other cygfoo.dlls? > > > Shouldn't that be /usr/bin/cyghttpd.dll? > > ^^^ > > It is the same like it is with perl or python. These packages > doesn't use libtool and to change the name would need some additional > patches in a lot of build related files which would blow up the patch. yep, Gerrit is right here. I may change it if absolutely required, but it has to be patched in the Makefile.tmpl's and the main src/Configure script. Is it _absolutely_ required? setup.html does not state it, IMO?! Stipe tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: info AT wapme-systems DOT de Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are