Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:52:45 +0100
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53t) Business
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
Organization: convey Information Systems GmbH
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <816103055.20020109125245@familiehaase.de>
To: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22 package available for setup inclusion
In-Reply-To: <20020109124852.C1242@cygbert.vinschen.de>
References: <3C3BFC4C DOT 15C3C81A AT wapme-systems DOT de>
 <20020109124852 DOT C1242 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 Corinna,

2002-01-09 12:50:02, du schriebst:

> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>> Users may have to include /usr/libexec to their PATH, due to the fact
>> that libhttpd.dll resides there. Should we move at least that core
>> library to /usr/bin to have it in PATH like the other cygfoo.dlls?

> Shouldn't that be /usr/bin/cyghttpd.dll?
>                            ^^^

It is the same like it is with perl or python.  These packages
doesn't use libtool and to change the name would need some additional
patches in a lot of build related files which would blow up the patch.

But I'll look what I can do regarding the next perl release.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=