Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: Gary's Setup.exe v2.162 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 04:09:00 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3C35EE02.8080401@home.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of David A. Cobb > > Downloaded 01/04/02, > Some uglinesses: > Thanks for taking a look at this David. First thing though: vz. 2.162 isn't current. Did you get this from the link to my own site that I posted a week or so ago? If so I have to apologize; I neglected to pull that down when subsequent snapshots became available (i just pulled it now). Current build from HEAD of cvs shows vz. 2.169. > CHOOSER: > View:Category > Click category=Base ('cause it's numerous), observe painting of text > quits after about 8 lines. White space is painted sufficient to fit the > "missing" text. Further digging reveals that painting text of the > package names quits at y=~2/3 height, by the time I tried expanding > Graphics it only painted 1 package. I'm not seeing anything like this whatsoever. Sounds extremely bizzarre, as a WAG is it maybe old video drivers? > Click category=Doc, observe program "wants" to Uninstall libxml2 & > libxslt. Both show "skip" for me; I don't have either installed yet on this machine. > After a few more games, selected "Experimental". Now Doc > category "wants" to keep xml2 & xslt but *uninstall* man & newlib-man. Yep, this I see. I read Rob's explanation and FWICT this isn't the intended behavior overall, but there's some question as to where it should be dealt with. > Select "Prev", observe the program now wants to uninstall anything for > which it doesn't find a "prev". IMHO "prev" should *skip* any package > where it's not possible to back up. > Yeah, I agree, and again I believe the above comment applies. Rob, speaking from a position of relative ignorance on this particular issue, I don't think we should rely on this being handled solely in setup.ini if it's possible to do so in setup.exe itself, at least as a second line of defense. Invariably something will get into setup.ini not-quite-right, and setup will start uninstalling people's mans, etc. > View:Full or Partial > Same ugliness as above, painting of package names quits at y=2/3. > Play with the vertical scroll. Doing it slowly left me with > *nothing* in > the display area - once I scrolled the fractured text up off the display > it doesn't come back. > Play QUICKLY with the vertical scroll. Fragments of text show up, > unintelligable, at divers points in the list of packages. Again I see nothing remotely like this (nor did I notice anything like it in older builds for that matter). Which OS are you on? BTW: Setup.exe isn't *all* mine ;-). Only the bug-free parts; I don't know who's sneaking those bugs in there ;-). -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot.