Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <065901c18f8d$05f2e650$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <05bb01c18f64$5f3142d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011228114125 DOT M27340 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Subject: Re: Robots binary package
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:46:57 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2001 10:47:08.0471 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF4FFC70:01C18F8C]

The configure flags for the package perhaps. I thought that having
/usr/doc/Cygwin/foo-readme was standard for binary packages - see this
thread (Started by you :])

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-06/msg00021.html

Rob
===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: Robots binary package


> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 04:56:19PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Is missing /usr/doc/Cygwin/Robots-2.0.1.README.
> >
> > Is that intentional?
>
> Yes.  What do you want to read?
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin
to
> Cygwin Developer
mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>