Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:00:01 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units) Message-ID: <20011219220001.GA4889@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C20BA86 DOT 6000001 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011219161644 DOT GB23322 AT redhat DOT com> <3C20CABF DOT EC49754B AT etr-usa DOT com> <20011219172057 DOT GA24344 AT redhat DOT com> <3C20D41A DOT 3010203 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <05f401c188d5$46fbe750$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05f401c188d5$46fbe750$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:36:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >=== >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Charles Wilson" >> > Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate >package. >> >> How about this: >> John, why don't you create a "bashutils" package, to serve as a >> collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings. For now, >> it could contain only bashcompletion, but later you could add -- oh, >> bashprompt, or something... > >Funnily enough, I suggested calling the package bashtools last night. >Hmmm, now why was that? Doh. I missed this. I probably could have just agreed with this suggestion and saved myself some grief. I think that the concept makes sense regardless of the name. cgf