Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 12:26:00 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Message-ID: <20011219172600.GB24344@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CCD084B0E779D411A70300508B6622260361F99C AT exchukahis02 DOT experian DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CCD084B0E779D411A70300508B6622260361F99C@exchukahis02.experian.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -0000, Morrison, John wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
>> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
>> Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
>> I hate to be a wet blanket about this but I'm not convinced 
>> that this package
>> belongs in the distribution.  It seems too narrow in scope for its own
>> package.
>
>Fair enough - I found it today and found it useful.  I thought one of the
>purposes of this list was to question whether an app would be a nice
>addition.

It is.  This was part of my response to the question.

I'm not going to veto anything if the consensus is that it's useful.  I
can, in fact, see why it would be useful.

cgf