Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:50:26 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Message-ID: <20011219165026.GB24101@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E80 AT exchukthis02 DOT experian DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E80@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:31:40PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
>That's what the webpage implies.  If that's not what it means, then surely
>you have to agree that the page is confusing.

I guess now I understand at least one specific confusion.

Robert already clarified the intent of the section.  Go back and read
his reply to John.  He wasn't saying that the cygwin package has to rely
on itself.

I guess I'll take a stab at adding more words.

cgf