Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F803794E78@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk>
From: "Ebrey, Carl" <Carl DOT Ebrey AT uk DOT experian DOT com>
To: "'cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: FW: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:58:55 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain

Gah!  I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead.  Sorry about that...

Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any "Shell Utils" category.
What it does quite clearly state is, "Please do not invent a new category
without checking with the cygwin-apps mailing list first".  Does that mean
that we should consider that to be a proposal for a new category? :)

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Morrison, John
Cc: 'cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)




"Morrison, John" wrote:
> 
> OK,
> 
> The setup.hint and bz2 packages can be found at:
> 
> http://www.straylight.eu.org/~carl/bash_completion/
> 
> Here's the hint file...
> 
> sdesc: "A script of Bash completion rules."
> ldesc: "A relatively new feature in bash is programmable completion,
> which has been available since the beta version of 2.04.  This extends the
> built in filename completion to programs such as ssh and cvs.
> http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml#completion."
> test: 1.0-1
> category: Utils
> requires: bash
> 

I think that `category: Utils' is too generic.  I'd prefer Misc but
that's reserved.  How about `category: Shell Utils'?

Earnie

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF