Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3C20B4E4.3000906@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:40:20 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Restructuring gettext
References: <F244zf41rKQoxeGd3Sv000073e6 AT hotmail DOT com> <3C204477 DOT 8050904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <89171218669 DOT 20011219110934 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

> 
> What is the problem here?  libintl and libintl1 are two different packages
> with different names.


But there's only one nano.  (sounds like an ad campaign)  So, nano's 
setup.hint has a line like:

requires: foo bar libintl

Later, the (then-)current nano will

requires: foo bar libintl1

but the prev: version of nano still requires libintl.  The debate is 
whether, during that transition period where prev: and curr: have 
DIFFERENT requires, if we should say

requires: foo bar libintl libintl1

to satisfy both prev and curr.

--Chuck