Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 22:12:18 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: rebase
Message-ID: <20011219031218.GE10253@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20011218154548 DOT GA1152 AT dothill DOT com> <3C1F7040 DOT 9020604 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C1F7040.9020604@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:35:12AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Jason Tishler wrote:
>
>>I would like to contribute my rebase utility.  Should it be a stand-alone
>>package?  Be added to another package (i.e., cygutils -- sorry to suggest
>>this Chuck...)?  Or, be added to winsup/utils?
>
>I think it should go in winsup/utils, but I've no objections to putting 
>it in cygutils.

Actually, I think it should go in binutils, so there's a third opinion.

cgf