Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <007801c1869a$f37e70c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <15fe01c1868c$af278230$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011217010408 DOT GB30991 AT redhat DOT com> <001f01c18696$df59df70$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011217011008 DOT GA32497 AT redhat DOT com> <004101c18697$c0bd7530$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011217013128 DOT GA395 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: has anyone tried latest setup.exe from cvs ? Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 12:34:20 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2001 01:34:10.0289 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED07EE10:01C1869A] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > It's not a valid example, is it? setup.ini doesn't look like this now. > upset only does this for packages whose tar files have no versions, > which is currently: diff, gperf, m4, I think. Actually I was wrong with the example. setup.exe will fail if there is no version: AND there is no install: If there is either a version: or an install: it will be ok. Rob