Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: RFP: texmf References: <20011203212637 DOT GA29013 AT redhat DOT com> Organization: Jan at Appel From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: 03 Dec 2001 23:06:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20011203212637.GA29013@redhat.com> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2001 16:26:37 -0500") Message-ID: Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Christopher Faylor writes: > >Note that tetex-beta may need a rebuild and possibly a dependency on > >texmf-base; which is beyond my capabilities. > > It sounds like this is beyond our capabilities, too. If this is going > to break an existing package then there is no way we can accept it. If you look at it that way, tetex-beta should have been removed a long time ago. It needs a rebuild for certain executables, which has nothing to do with this texmf package. (Texmf is platform independent.) In fact, tetex-beta has been fairly useless (IMHO) because it lacks a texmf tree, that the user was supposed to provide. We've been waiting for a long time for the tetex-beta maintainer to provide the missing texmf package. Now that he said he wasn't planning to provide it at all, I've asked around if a texmf package would be welcomed (and subsequently spent quite some time on it). Note that for most normal use (running tex/latex) it will work fine. Providing a broken package is no use to me. I don't even have a windows machine; this is only for [our] windows users. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org