Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <04e801c17c42$893ebb00$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <20011203212637 DOT GA29013 AT redhat DOT com> <04d401c17c41$62a89b60$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011203213454 DOT GB29013 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: RFP: texmf Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:36:14 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2001 21:36:13.0343 (UTC) FILETIME=[87F01AF0:01C17C42] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > >> It sounds like this is beyond our capabilities, too. If this is going > >> to break an existing package then there is no way we can accept it. > > > >The rebuild is due to tetex-beta's being ~ a year old, and libpng has > >changed - so tetex-beta needs a rebuild with or without this new > >package. > > If you are saying that tetex-beta is currently inoperable then it should > be removed from the distribution or fixed. If it is still working ok, > but needs an upgrade to work with texmf then, obviously, some > synchronization needs to happen. Agreed. I have never used the package, so I can't comment meaningfully - I had tracked the conversation about tetex-beta & texmf though. Rob