Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: [RFP] misc from cygutils
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:23:50 -0600
Message-ID: <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKIEKFCHAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <20011128184239.O14975@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Importance: Normal

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:12:33AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > >That's three! Cool!  (But I still need to wait a few days in case the
> > >all-powerful veto appears...)
> >
> > Booming voice:
> >
> > I am well pleased with this package.
> >
> > I think it should be chuckutils, though...
>
> Yeah, or "cygchuck"...
>
> Corinna

This is all well and good, but the real question remains: How much cyg could a
cygchuck chuck if a cygchuck could chuck cyg?

Ok, that was bad even by my low standards ;-).

--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.