Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3C04EAD3.4225D58F@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:46:59 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: CA List X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: CA List , Charles Wilson Subject: Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with setup.ini) References: <20011126213622 DOT 71874 DOT qmail AT web20004 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1006938304 DOT 712 DOT 23 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3C04AC25 DOT 90100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3C04E3A6 DOT AE83A8CD AT yahoo DOT com> <019801c17812$405c9bc0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Earnie Boyd" > > > > Agreed. Shall we get rid of the separate archivers category? > > > > > > fine by me. > > > > > > > Uhm, bzip2, gzip, unzip and zip aren't archivers, they are compression > > utilities. Tar, mt and ar are archivers. > > I know. Your point being? Do you agree that we should get rid of > 'archivers' or disagree? > > The only things in 'archivers' are sharutils, zip and unzip. Once zip > and unzip are in utils, there's little need for sharutils to be in > archivers, as all the other archivers are also in utils. > Yes, get rid of it. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com