Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3C04E3A6.AE83A8CD@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:16:22 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
   Joshua Franklin <joshuadfranklin AT yahoo DOT com>, cygwin-apps AT Cygwin DOT Com
Subject: Re: attn: which, bzip2,gzip maintainers (was Re: some problems with	
 setup.ini)
References: <20011126213622 DOT 71874 DOT qmail AT web20004 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1006938304 DOT 712 DOT 23 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3C04AC25 DOT 90100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Charles Wilson wrote:
> 
> Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> >>And, IMHO, bzip2 gzip unzip zip are all similar enough
> >>to be in the same category. Or not.
> >>
> >
> > Agreed. Shall we get rid of the separate archivers category?
> 
> fine by me.
> 

Uhm, bzip2, gzip, unzip and zip aren't archivers, they are compression
utilities.  Tar, mt and ar are archivers.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com