Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <00f801c17729$209b2ed0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Charles Wilson" , References: <3C032ACF DOT 2040006 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Subject: Re: [RFP] misc from cygutils Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:51:44 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2001 09:51:40.0957 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D2764D0:01C17729] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wilson" > So, three questions: > > 1) can I add misc to the official dist? IMO, yes. > 2) can anybody come up with a better name? This package is intended to > be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a > single source code file of moderate length). Uhmm, not really :[. I don't think it's worth the effort to split the tools out, and they dont' fit neatly into any one category... BTW, it seems to me that dump == od, and [put|get]clip are somewhat redundant. > 3) Did I make the right decision w.r.t. the IPC tools? Eventually we'll > have real, built-in IPC and those tools can then be distributed without > requiring cygipc... IMO, yes. I'm sure there will be bug reports, but hey :}. Rob