Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:56:06 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Proposal: Remove source tracking from setup Message-ID: <20011121035606.GE16959@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <090f01c17233$264e2a80$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011121025233 DOT GA15920 AT redhat DOT com> <095701c1723c$4061a5b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <095701c1723c$4061a5b0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 02:26:03PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >howabout "INSTALLED.DB 2" then? It's the space that is the problem. That would have cygcheck report a package named INSTALLED.DB with a version of 2, I think. Maybe that's no big deal. It might even be useful until such time as we can upgrade cygcheck. cgf