Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: RE: -src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:44:57 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: -src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Index: AcFxa55oX/9fyOtwRpGpGY1giE59lQAAULGQ From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id fAK2j9i27709 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > The last I heard, as of last Friday when you sent email about > "clickable > categories", we were going with clickable categories. This goes back quite a few months to when the categories code was first written. I raised the issue of metapackages (as I call them) and even went so far as to test one - see the cygwin developers list archives. It's not a new thing, and not even surprising. > Thanks for playing along. In other words, this problem has nothing to > do with what we're talking about. > > > You're arguing that we can't use the word "All" because someone will > be upset when gvim isn't installed. Hmm. I thought I was argueing that we can't use the word all because - eventually - we won't be able to satisfy that. However as I said, I only code the software. I'll hack up clickable categories this week. Rob