Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [129.78.64.17]
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: -src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:08:19 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F18vMUtu69QDOXkQpFj00006923@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2001 23:08:20.0232 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA063080:01C17085]

<SNIP LOTS>
>
>Is this an acceptable compromise?

I forgot that #3 didnt have build script outside (or did I... how could it 
be pristine source ... ummm I think I am a bit lost here).
#4 did.
My amendment to say that I liked #3 - if the suggestion I made to setup.exe 
would be acceptable.  I now change that to either #5 or #5a (which seem like 
#4 without the package directory name?) and I will write a patch for 
setup.exe which is not default... (but can be set up to be via some means) 
once setup.exe asks where to put src. - this is assuming I have managed to 
read things correctly this time...

Gareth (may end up replying again when he realises hes completely 
confused... not just patially)

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp