Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <00ed01c17038$3cbd8f60$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20011114213213 DOT GA9676 AT redhat DOT com> <86ofm3ti20 DOT fsf AT bock DOT chem DOT unc DOT edu> <00c001c16e61$dea82890$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011116194250 DOT GN17035 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: package voting rules (was Re: compface package)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:52:17 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2001 13:52:18.0283 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CC0C3B0:01C17038]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:42 AM
Subject: package voting rules (was Re: compface package)


> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:45:15PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >Thank you. I've no objection to this: does any other maintainer have
an
> >objection to compface being a package?
>
> None from me.
>
> For voting, how about just saying that if three maintainers like it,
it's
> in?  If one vetoes it, it requires discussion, and five votes for
> inclusion?

Fine by me.

> I'm trying to avoid having to tally the total number of maintainers,
> basically.

Sure. I thought I avoided that by my "it's in after 3 days unless
someone objects" approach. Which is simpler still :}.

Rob