Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <004901c17034$6c52caa0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Jonathan Kamens" , References: <20011118025605 DOT 17324 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> Subject: Re: Non-intuitive setup.exe behavior -- downloading is affected by what's installed? Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:24:59 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2001 13:25:00.0174 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C5D2AE0:01C17034] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Kamens" To: Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 1:56 PM Subject: Non-intuitive setup.exe behavior -- downloading is affected by what's installed? > However, when the new version of setup.exe is downloading into a local > directory, it apparently by default skips packages that are not > already installed on the local machine. For example, when I ran it > tonight, it decided to skip indent, since of course I don't have > indent installed locally since I've never installed it before. > Similarly, it's telling me that it's skipping the download of "cvs" > since I don't have it installed. Right, this is by design. Setup.exe is _not_ a mirror creation tool, nor IMO should it be. FTP && HTTP based mirror tools exist already. > Of course, I can work around this problem -- I'll just use wget or > mirror to mirror the whole tree from one of the Cygwin mirrors instead > of downloading it with setup.exe. But I just wanted to comment that > the current behavior of setup.exe doesn't seem fully intuitive. I guess that depends on what your expectation of "download only" is. As usual, I'll accept patches to extend setup, but in this case I'd suggest that a button be added labelled "download all packages" > Note, however, that it's obvious that a lot of work has gone into the > new interface and functionality, and overall, I like it a lot. > Thanks! I'm glad you like it. Rob