Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Originating-IP: [198.142.165.216] From: "Gareth Pearce" To: References: <20011115001930 DOT GB10865 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: Nano - comments? Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:37:48 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2001 00:37:49.0632 (UTC) FILETIME=[C0C89C00:01C16D6D] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Nano - comments? > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:15:30AM +1100, Gareth Pearce wrote: > >As I guess you all know if you read my last couple of emails, I would like > >to package up (and maintain) Nano - the text editor which is sort of > >becomming the 'standard' base text editor in debian I believe, and also my > >text editor of choice. I am guessing that it would be highly likely that it > >would be accepted so long as I do a better job then my first hash at indent > >:) but I thought I should ask anyway. > > Gee, I don't know. This would alleviate the highly entertaining "I > don't see why you don't provide nano" messages that crop up consistently > in cygwin AT cygwin. a quick search of cygwin AT cygwin message list - provides 18 matches to the word nano - of which only ~4 mention it properly and at least 2 of those are about how they successfully got it working. is the message list search broken? > > I'll be forced to resort to introducing random segv's in gdb just to > amuse myself... so long as they are specific to any operating system but mine... keep up the good work! > > cgf > PS: I guess thats a yes :P