Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Originating-IP: [198.142.165.216] From: "Gareth Pearce" To: "Gerrit P. Haase" References: <00bf01c16ce9$876c0e30$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <16414404382 DOT 20011114212730 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3BF2D6E8 DOT 64692533 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <043701c16d54$25297940$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <15318685538 DOT 20011114223851 AT familiehaase DOT de> Subject: Re: RFP (request for package) GNU indent Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:03:50 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2001 00:03:56.0732 (UTC) FILETIME=[0514AFC0:01C16D69] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerrit P. Haase" To: "Gareth Pearce" Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:38 AM Subject: Re: RFP (request for package) GNU indent > Hallo Gareth, > > 2001-11-14 22:34:03, du schriebst: > > > If you both are, flip a coin or something. I really don't care who is > > the maintainer. Discuss it privately. Get back to the list with an > > answer. > > > Until then I'm not going to waste time looking at either set of > > tarballs. > > Oki doki, Robert has spoken;) indeed he has > > Well, I don't mind to *not* maintain the package, take a look at my > package please: > http://timtowtdi.topcities.com/cygwin/indent/ if it is still there. > > Take it or leave it or pack up a second one, basically yours is ok, > but the 'dir' file must go and a postinstall script is nice too. my reasons for packaging up indent was as practice mainly ... discover what things I got wrong so that the package that I really would like to maintain (nano) I would have better luck getting it done - ident is completely OOTB depends on nothing ... so it looked like an ideal target for a first go... and indeed i have learned a few things... like no dir files in the distribution ;) - so now I dont really care at all so long as i find out exactly the post-install script is supposed to be done - should of remembered to put that question in my post this morning ... but i was too sleepy... same reason why i didnt write a setup.hint... But your job looks better done, and if your willing to maintain it then I would say go for it ... I will get to work packaging up nano - which ofcourse was my original aim. Gareth