Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <03b901c16d51$b8f75500$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF7A48 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>	<3BE4D4A7	.2070900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> 	<20011104104732 DOT X17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>	<1004867892 DOT 5388 DOT 54 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>  <3BE702C3 DOT 5010008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1004999653 DOT 4685 DOT 20 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE71DF4 DOT 20802 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BEFAA8F DOT 4020900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF17502 DOT 6020902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <006101c16cd9$8c0e8770$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <010e01c16cef$78c8be90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF2CA1A DOT 34130B9D AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:17:09 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2001 21:22:49.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[82C9E5A0:01C16D52]




----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion


> Robert Collins wrote:
> > It's got what I was meaning in all those discussion. If you could
put it
> > up for comparison with your 1st and 2nd style tarballs that'd be
great.
>
> Okay, it's up there.
>
> But it isn't a FULL example.  You didn't modify the
> CYGWIN-PATCHES/mktemp.README file to reflect *your* building style.
You
> didn't change CYGWIN-PATCHES/mktemp-1.3.1-1.sh to reflect the way
*you*
> think the build procedure should work.  Both files still refer to
things
> like /usr/doc/cygwin/SOURCES and /usr/doc/cygwin/BUILD etc.

Which is fine, because I've been keeping out of that part of the
process.

> You merely changed the name of the internal tarball slightly.

Correct, because it should have been the vendors tarball as is.

> I want to see a REAL, FULL example of your idea, as integrated with
> setup's *current* capabilities.  I *thought* that my -style2 did that.
> You left my -style2 shell script as is, but changed just enough in the
> package structure so that the script doesn't work.  You changed a
little
> of the README but it still isn't a completely accurate representation
of
> *your* structure.

I didn't realise I'd altered the README. Oops. I've been maintaining
that what I'm talking about is orthogonal to the package building at
this point. However I've updated the script & readme to use the
structure I have in the tarball. I've also mailed you another style3
tarball... built via 'mktemp-1.3.1-1.sh all'

> Also, if the -src tarball is going to contain mktemp-1.3.1-1.patch,
then
> the src tarball should be named mktemp-1.3.1-1-src.tar.bz2, NOT
> mktemp-1.3.1-src.tar.bz2.  Otherwise, how will you differentiate it
from
> the -src tarball that contains mktemp-1.3.1-2.patch?

The outer tarball is named that isn't it? Or did I label it badly when I
sent it to you. ...

looks like I named it badly. Yes the -src tarball should be
1.3.1-1-src.tar.bz2

Rob