Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BF2CA1A.34130B9D@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:46:34 -0500 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion References: <3BE4D4A7 .2070900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011104104732 DOT X17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1004867892 DOT 5388 DOT 54 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE702C3 DOT 5010008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1004999653 DOT 4685 DOT 20 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE71DF4 DOT 20802 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BEFAA8F DOT 4020900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BF17502 DOT 6020902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <006101c16cd9$8c0e8770$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <010e01c16cef$78c8be90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Robert Collins wrote: > It's got what I was meaning in all those discussion. If you could put it > up for comparison with your 1st and 2nd style tarballs that'd be great. Okay, it's up there. But it isn't a FULL example. You didn't modify the CYGWIN-PATCHES/mktemp.README file to reflect *your* building style. You didn't change CYGWIN-PATCHES/mktemp-1.3.1-1.sh to reflect the way *you* think the build procedure should work. Both files still refer to things like /usr/doc/cygwin/SOURCES and /usr/doc/cygwin/BUILD etc. You merely changed the name of the internal tarball slightly. I want to see a REAL, FULL example of your idea, as integrated with setup's *current* capabilities. I *thought* that my -style2 did that. You left my -style2 shell script as is, but changed just enough in the package structure so that the script doesn't work. You changed a little of the README but it still isn't a completely accurate representation of *your* structure. Also, if the -src tarball is going to contain mktemp-1.3.1-1.patch, then the src tarball should be named mktemp-1.3.1-1-src.tar.bz2, NOT mktemp-1.3.1-src.tar.bz2. Otherwise, how will you differentiate it from the -src tarball that contains mktemp-1.3.1-2.patch? --Chuck