Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3BF07A92.1422A16C@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:42:42 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: CA List <Cygwin-Apps AT Cygwin DOT Com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC: cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: looking for c++ indent
References: <03df01c16be2$b45ded80$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I haven't tried any of them yet but searching sourceforge.net for indent
provides several.  The one that I plan to look at first is gindent but I
haven't even downloaded yet.

Earnie.

Robert Collins wrote:

> The standard gnu indent is doing horrible things..
>
> i.e.
>
> @@ -97,7 +102,8 @@ auth_retry:
>
>        if (code < 200 || code >= 300)
>         {
> -         delete c;
> +         delete
> +           c;
>           return;
>         }
>
> Now, I'm of the opinion that second guessing your indent tool is a waste
> of time - may as well not have one.
>
> However, I'm quite happy to use a different indent tool, that stays with
> GNU indenting rules, but understands c++ well enough not to do the sort
> of idiocy show above.
>
> I don't have the time to research a replacement just now, or to fix
> indent itself, and it's a low priority - indent is consistent in what it
> does, not random, so diffs should be small from now on in.
>
> If someone here can suggest a better indent.. I'll take a look.
> Alternatively (preferred actually, but I don't wish to impinge on other
> folks time) if someone wanted to hack indent to be c++ aware (ideally
> including making things like headers with
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C" {
> #endif
> not indent the exported stuff.. that would be great.
>
> Rob


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com