Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:01:07 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: symlinks Message-ID: <20011111050107.GC22654@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3BEDFE95 DOT 3000200 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011111043838 DOT GA22496 AT redhat DOT com> <3BEE0392 DOT 4030204 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BEE0392.4030204@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 11:50:26PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >However, I agree that cygwin shouldn't try to interpret "normal" windows >.lnk files -- but I thought Corinna put heuristics in so that cygwin >wouldn't do that. Yes, she did. I just remember her talking (as in on the phone) about this and wondering if the .lnk files were really a good idea after all. cgf