Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <014001c16a6b$9e42fe00$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <3BEDFE95 DOT 3000200 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011111043838 DOT GA22496 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: symlinks Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:44:57 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 04:50:53.0299 (UTC) FILETIME=[714D5430:01C16A6C] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > I don't anticipate that they will ever go away, so I think we should stick > with having setup.exe create the "old style" method. It will keep the > code size down in setup.exe. Actually it won't - we already create .lnk files for the start menu. (It was aiming to reduce that overhead that caused my question. > Or, maybe this will become a non-issue when/if setup.exe is split in two > since we'll be able to use cygwin tar at that point. Not really, because the inital bootstrap may well have shortcuts in it. Rob