Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <013a01c16a6a$9e852c90$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Charles Wilson" Cc: References: <3BEDFE95 DOT 3000200 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Subject: Re: symlinks Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:37:48 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 04:43:44.0292 (UTC) FILETIME=[71980E40:01C16A6B] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wilson" To: "Robert Collins" Cc: Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 3:29 PM Subject: Re: symlinks > Robert Collins wrote: > > > When extracting tarballs, should setup create 'native' symlinks or magic > > cookie symlinks? > > > I thought the magic cookie (!target) symlinks were deprecated. > Currently, "ln -s" makes "special" .lnk shortcuts; I think setup should do > the same -- there should be no difference between the following scenarios: This is why I'm asking - I thought that there was a cygwin option to turn off .lnk file creation. If that option exists, then should setup honour it? Rob