Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:25:38 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Want to be a gcc/binutils maintainer?
Message-ID: <20011107212538.A13630@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010908230405 DOT A17395 AT redhat DOT com> <20011107002202 DOT A11903 AT redhat DOT com> <160456152372 DOT 20011107181103 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <160456152372.20011107181103@logos-m.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 06:11:03PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>i wonder if we can create a branch in gcc cvs tree to make
>cygwin-specific gcc development process a bit more "public"?

Has anyone asked this question in gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org?

I have seen other people do this, so I assume it is ok.  You might need
permission first, though.

cgf