Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 19:55:50 EST
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Setup.exe - snapshot runs but compiled from cvs get application error.
X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va
Message-Id: <VA.000009a0.0194836d@thesoftwaresource.com>
From: Brian Keener <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20011105191406.B32138@redhat.com>
References: <VA DOT 0000099c DOT 00f73c38 AT thesoftwaresource DOT com> <20011105180726 DOT B23290 AT redhat DOT com> <1005001996 DOT 576 DOT 9 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <VA DOT 0000099f DOT 016baade AT thesoftwaresource DOT com> <20011105191406 DOT B32138 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> IMO, setup.exe isn't a good place for a beginning C++ programmer since it
> has a curious mixture of C and C++ strategies.  Maybe this is a reflection
>
Not to drift this thread to much - but that is probably why I was doing better 
with the earlier setup when I was making changes - I know a little C or at 
least enough I could make some changes and figure out what a lot of the code 
was doing.  Now I can still figure it out, it's just more complex and harder 
for me to make changes to it.

But I keep trying.

bk