Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:05:11 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygapp Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion Message-ID: <20011105230511.J17306@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygapp References: <3BE4D4A7 DOT 2070900 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011104104732 DOT X17306 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1004867892 DOT 5388 DOT 54 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE702C3 DOT 5010008 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BE702C3.5010008@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 04:21:07PM -0500 On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 04:21:07PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > My proposal (revised) > Use the standard RPM tree (SOURCES, BUILD, SPEC, RPMS, SRPMS) > -src is a tarball which contains > SOURCES/foo-VER-REL-orig.tar.bz2 > SOURCES/foo-VER-REL.diff (creates the cgywin README) > SOURCES/foo-VER-REL-X.diff (if necessary) > SPECS/foo-VER-REL.* > .spec or .sh or .rule or whatever. > setup unpacks this into /usr/src/cygwin. > the end. Nothing else is specified yet. Your proposal has a disadvantage: The src package isn't compatible to the current packaging scheme. ==> All packages have to be repacked. A clear no-no, IMO. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.