Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 22:35:01 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: patches to vendor source trees - discussion
Message-ID: <20011103223501.A4579@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF7A48 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF7A48@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 02:35:32PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> As much as Chris doesn't like it, there ARE advantages to the 
>> RPM style. 
>
>I'm not sure on Chris' opinion, but I am a debian convert :}.

I don't have a real strong feeling.  I like using rpm but I think I
like debian's layouts better.

I don't really have a strong opinion either way, so I'll let you guys
come up with something, wait a few months, and then ask why the heck we
did things that way...

cgf