Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 12:01:28 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-apps Digest 2 Nov 2001 18:46:34 -0000 Issue 223 Message-ID: <20011103120128.C18219@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <20011103052046 DOT 46423 DOT qmail AT web20008 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1004786864 DOT 1816 DOT 13 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1004786864.1816.13.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:27:43PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Sat, 2001-11-03 at 16:20, Joshua Franklin wrote: >> > >So cygwin should depend on bash and shellutils. >> > >> > How do you figure that? >>Rob's right, it means setup.exe (for cygwin.bat and /etc/profile) >>should "depend" on the bash and shellutils packages. Hm. Evil >>thought--why not make the setup.exe auto-updating feature grab the file >>as /latest/setup/setup.tar.bz2, make the cinstall src available through >>setup.exe. In other words, make setup.exe a package. May be more >>complicated than it's worth, I haven't seen the auto-updating code. > >Good idea. It's one discussed very briefly recently on the dev list, >and the actual concept behind setup auto updating. Baby steps though - >once setup is able to autoupdate we can do this. Actually, IMO, what the above means is that cygwin.bat should not be created if bash.exe is not installed. There is no requirement that cygwin.bat should always be created. It makes no sense to do so if you have not downloaded the correct components. cgf