Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:34:10 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Autotools; new versions Message-ID: <20010920143410.B5666@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3BAA33FD DOT 9C1B704C AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BAA33FD.9C1B704C@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:22:53PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Since there are incompatibilities between > autoconf-2.13 and autoconf-2.5x > automake-1.4 and automake-1.5 > >and most (cygwin-external) projects have been slow and/or resistant to >migrate to the newer versions, > >and cgf doesn't want to "push the envelope" on autotools from cygwin >(let other projects migrate FIRST, then we follow) > >and libtool/autoconf/automake must all share the same prefix (usr or >usr/local or...) Robert suggested that debian has a wrapper that tries to infer which version of autoconf to run. Is this something worth considering? cgf