Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated setup.ini with descriptions, categories, and
	dependencies
From: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20010828141502.A7113@redhat.com>
References: <20010828150605 DOT F25382 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<3B8BEC04 DOT 663 DOT 1C93E90 AT localhost>  <20010828141502 DOT A7113 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <999049770.28151.2.camel@robertlinux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release)
Date: 29 Aug 2001 11:55:31 +1000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2001 01:56:32.0710 (UTC) FILETIME=[D3BC9E60:01C1302D]

On 28 Aug 2001 14:15:02 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> I actually started using Debian.  My original script scanned the Debian
> package list.  I like their categories better, too.

Welcome to the light side.
 
> We can use as many categories as we like, actually, but it will probably
> be confusing unless we converge on a standard of some kind.

I like the debian categories too - theres no reason we can't use those
while aiming at rpm packages is there?

Rob