Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:08:23 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: dejagnu-1.4.1 packaging in progress Message-ID: <20010724210823.A5482@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <8D00C32549556B4E977F81DBC24E985D1B1BA5 AT crtsmail1 DOT technol_exch DOT corp DOT riotinto DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <8D00C32549556B4E977F81DBC24E985D1B1BA5@crtsmail1.technol_exch.corp.riotinto.org>; from David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:40:01AM -0000 On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:40:01AM -0000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: >My objective is to be able to test gcc-3 on cygwin with the official >cygwin dejagnu. I will (try and) do whatever is needed to acheive this >result. > >Some questions: > >Is there an easy way to identify the "local cygwin hacks"? Hmm. I don't believe that there is. There may be an import branch for dejagnu in CVS but I don't know for sure. >For example, do you know of a dejagnu version that is a common predecessor >of both gnu dejagnu-1.4.1 and the dejagnu from sources.redhat.com? (or do I >just diff source trees?) Again, I don't know. Is there a dejagnu version number that could provide a clue? For all I know the cygwin stuff is already in dejagnu 1.4.1. >Is there some performance spec for cygwin dejagnu to meet? >For example, a cygwin dejagnu must run the xxx and yyy testsuites? Just being able to run gcc, binutils, gdb, should be adequate. cgf