Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B4697E2.9050102@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 01:02:26 -0400
From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, Dario Alcocer <alcocer AT helixdigital DOT com>
Subject: Re: Package maintainer release procedures
References: <15174 DOT 18698 DOT 346785 DOT 618387 AT coyote DOT priv DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3B465441 DOT C8695619 AT t-online DOT de> <15174 DOT 22196 DOT 669125 DOT 221517 AT coyote DOT priv DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3B4661CC DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010706233416 DOT B5480 AT redhat DOT com> <3B469781 DOT 3090303 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Oh yeah -- I also renamed the packages from "ghostscript-6.51*" to 
"ghostscript-6.51-1*".

--Chuck

Charles S. Wilson wrote:

> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> 
>>> 2) I have also seen cgf specifically request that a contributor mail 
>>> the files to him, and he has placed them on sourceware.  (Don't just 
>>> spam him with unsolicited tarballs, though -- wait for a request)
>>>
>>
>> Right.  If you give me a URL so that I can download your tar balls, I 
>> will
>> do that.
> 
> 
> 
> I've already uploaded them to sourceware -- they're in ~cwilson.  I 
> checked them out -- they look okay to me.  I converted them from .gz to 
> .bz2 to save ~1.2M on download, and I also noticed that the gs.exe 
> binary was not stripped.
> 
> However, when I unpacked and stripped the gs.exe, it didn't really 
> shrink the binary size enough to justify "re-owning" all the files in 
> the tarballs as "cwilson" vs. "alcocer".  So, I didn't adjust that.
> 
> 
>>
>> Otherwise send them to me, one per email message, binary and source.  
>> I want
>> to make sure that the installation "conforms" to our loose standards.
> 
> 
> 
> Since you expressed this interest, I didn't put the tarballs into 
> contrib/ghostscript.  Go ahead and take a look yourself, and then move 
> 'em over after.
> 
> 
>> Until I set up some kind of cgi script for submitting these things, I
>> think that I would like to be the funnel for these requests for the time
>> being.  Although any cygwin developer can substitute in a pinch.
> 
> 
> 
> --Chuck
>