Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B469781.3090303@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 01:00:49 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com CC: Dario Alcocer Subject: Re: Package maintainer release procedures References: <15174 DOT 18698 DOT 346785 DOT 618387 AT coyote DOT priv DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3B465441 DOT C8695619 AT t-online DOT de> <15174 DOT 22196 DOT 669125 DOT 221517 AT coyote DOT priv DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3B4661CC DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010706233416 DOT B5480 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: >>2) I have also seen cgf specifically request that a contributor mail the >>files to him, and he has placed them on sourceware. (Don't just spam >>him with unsolicited tarballs, though -- wait for a request) >> > > Right. If you give me a URL so that I can download your tar balls, I will > do that. I've already uploaded them to sourceware -- they're in ~cwilson. I checked them out -- they look okay to me. I converted them from .gz to .bz2 to save ~1.2M on download, and I also noticed that the gs.exe binary was not stripped. However, when I unpacked and stripped the gs.exe, it didn't really shrink the binary size enough to justify "re-owning" all the files in the tarballs as "cwilson" vs. "alcocer". So, I didn't adjust that. > > Otherwise send them to me, one per email message, binary and source. I want > to make sure that the installation "conforms" to our loose standards. Since you expressed this interest, I didn't put the tarballs into contrib/ghostscript. Go ahead and take a look yourself, and then move 'em over after. > Until I set up some kind of cgi script for submitting these things, I > think that I would like to be the funnel for these requests for the time > being. Although any cygwin developer can substitute in a pinch. --Chuck