Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3B27D887.4C61B86B@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:17:59 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Cygwin Apps X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ask for delivering cygwin 1.1.8 with kde 1.1.2 References: <000901c0f3f4$413954e0$6e032bb7 AT BRAMSCHE> <011801c0f3f8$7f2034f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010613121730 DOT B7791 AT redhat DOT com> <3B27A333 DOT 16DAB936 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010613151508 DOT C9723 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:30:27PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote: > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> > >> The check_for_executable global is actually not used in 1.3.2. This > >> was a 1.3.1 thing. It should eventually disappear. There is no > >> need for a patch. > > > >!@%!@#$ > > > >So you're saying I need to produce an updated version of ncurses that is > >compiled under 1.3.2 (so that it won't look for check_for_executable), > >right? > > Binaries built with 1.3.1 will continue to work with 1.3.2 and beyond. > I haven't given up on the backwards compatibility committment. > Is that executable binary compatibility as well as object binary compatibility? Won't object libraries need to be rebuilt with the new version of the library? -- Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com